The PointBy Daniel Greenfield

Liberals Attack Rape Victim for Speaking Out Against Hillary Clinton

"It sounds as if she's of lower class which is always a factor in these cases... "

The Daily Beast ran an interview with a woman who had been raped and beaten into a coma when she was 12 years old. The incident left her unable to have children.

The man who did it was set free by Hillary Clinton, an incident that she recounted with sociopathic glee while laughing about her client failing a lie detector test.

The woman, raped once by her attackers and again by Hillary Clinton’s manipulation of the justice system, was angry at Hillary, not only because Hillary Clinton had saved the man who raped her from prison, but because Hillary Clinton had called her a liar who sought ought attention from older men who often made up stories.

Hillary Clinton was the one who was actually lying, as millions of Americans have since found out.

“Hillary Clinton took me through Hell,” the victim said.

“You are supposed to be for women? You call that [being] for women, what you done to me? And I hear you on tape laughing.”

“How many other lies has she told to get where she’s at today? If she becomes president, is she gonna be telling the world the truth? No.”

No sooner did the interview run than the same liberals who pretend to condemn Republicans over rape comments, gathered to attack the rape victim.


Okay; so the Koch Bros. have gotten hold of some poor hillbilly who has no understanding of the legal process, a hazy memory of a childhood incident, and is dirt poor and will say most anything for a few bucks…

Even if this lady’s complaints were cogent or logical, Mrs. Clinton’s record on women’s rights and advocacy is at least 99% stellar.

Aside from one child rape, her record is superstellar.


All of a sudden you’re now believing the words of a “taker”?  Unemployed and an ex-con.



i bet theres a juicy little swiss bank acct for her  transferred  by  roger ailes a s payment for suddenly wanting to bring up 40 yes after th fact

she probably barely remembered it  before fox reminded her



how much is the republican clown car paying this woman?    where’s her teabagger card she wears proudly?





“i’m a little scared to speak out.. “  BUT SHE DID!

“she might try to hurt me…. “   FK this woman..  i’m pizzed.



I wonder how much the GOP is paying this victim to come out with this story now. As a matter of fact, I wonder how much they paid that other “victim,” Monica Lewinsky to come out with her magazine article recently.



A forty-year-old, unsubstantiated story from someone we know know nothing about. What trash…



This is an ugly and sad story. She was a child and from her speech, it sounds as if she’s of lower class which is always a factor in these cases…

The GOP hates and fears Hillary becoming POTUS so, this won’t be the end of their smear campaign by any means.

Lower class. That comes from the party which claims to stand for the working class while making billions off them.


This woman waits for 39 years before speaking up?  Its not as if Hillary suddenly became a public figure in 2014.  This smells like another Right Wing gin up story to

Actually the woman had given an interview before, but she had been traumatized at the time and was not aware that Hillary Clinton was her rapist’s lawyer. And the reporter had manipulated her into giving a quote exonerating Hillary without telling her that the Democratic Party’s role model for covering up sexual abuses by powerful Democratic men was her rapist’s lawyer.


Everything in Hillary Clinton’s modern record as First Lady, as a Senator and as our Secretary of State proves that even if this incident happened as it’s being reported, she has more than made up for her error and has proven herself to be an unbending crusader against the never ending, militant misogyny that typifies the policies of the republican party.


Ralph Benner

Here we go again. TDB couldn’t get the goods on Woody, so now it sucks up and grants anonymity to some alleged victim to spread smears on Hillary about something that supposedly happened back in 1975.



To exactly recount facts 40 years later is a stretch that some will believe and most will not, sorry she was 12 at the time, but that also adds a level of child observation, guilt, misunderstanding, non-worldliness, and other immaturity’s to the mix.   This testimony is relegated to:  HEARSAY.



BTW, I’m a liberal - but I don’t care for HC.

As for the rest of the legal matters - of course she was just “doing her job.” And that’s a sleazy job. She didn’t just defend the guy - she SMEARED the child. She obviously MADE IT UP about the previous supposed accusations and the “romanticizing” of sexual experience. Yes, every girl wants to be beaten to a pulp put into a coma and assaulted and torn to bits by two grown men (animals) to lose her virginity. How romantic!

She obviously lied about the child. Must have known that she was in a coma  - how can she then imply that the child was “romanticizing” her experience. Sickening. Sickening. Sickening.

However, I have defended this woman thru Cookie Gate. the bimbo eruptions. White Water. Vince Foster. Benghazi.

I even defended this tape - because she was laughing at the ridiculousness of the legal process and playing a role she had to play to survive…but then to read about how she calls it “romanticizing” when she must have known the extent of the injuries…to make it up about previous “attacks”…is disgusting. And although it is standard operating procedure for lawyers, it’s still sickening.

If that’s not testimony enough about Clinton’s character, I don’t know what is.